检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨署东[1]
机构地区:[1]重庆大学法学院,重庆400044
出 处:《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2012年第2期122-129,共8页Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究项目基金资助项目(09XJA820015)
摘 要:正视封闭公司股东所面临的不同于公众公司的现实,美国公司法律实践日益信赖股东合理期待,常常以小股东权益为中心来界定压制行为,创设和发展了以股东合理期待为基础的股东权益救济制度,并逐渐形成了较为成熟的合理期待认定标准,尽可能地为受到不公平待遇的股东提供广泛的救济,以有效地保护受侵害股东的权益。基于合理期待落空而对股东权益进行救济的美国公司法理念与法律实践值得我们借鉴以完善我国股东权益救济制度。Addressing the different reality of closed corporations from public corporations, legal practices in the U. S. increasingly rely on reasonable expectations of shareholders and often define oppression acts centering on minority share- holders' fights and interests, which has created and developed lots of reliefs for aggrieved shareholders' rights and interestsbased on their reasonable expectations and has gradually evolved into a more mature standard of judging whether the expec- tations are reasonable or not to provide a broad relief to shareholders suffering unfair treatment as much as possible in order to effectively protect the rights and interests of aggrieved shareholders. We may learn a lot from the U.S. company law con-cepts and legal practices of reliefs based on the frustration of shareholders' reasonable expectations to improve the corre- sponding legal rules in China' s company law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222