从东亚样本看“后共产主义”研究的多元路径  

Diverse Paths of “Post-Communism” Studies——Perspective through East Asian Instance

作　　者：吕鹏[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院社会学研究所

出　　处：《俄罗斯研究》2012年第1期154-176,共23页Russian Studies

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目"要素市场的政商关系研究"(项目编号:11CSH038);教育部人文社科基金青年项目"东欧社会保障重建与政府职能转变与借鉴"(项目编号:06JCGJW003)的阶段性成果之一

摘　　要：一些学者认为"后共产主义"一词现今已经过时,理由是转型的成果在那些之前的欧洲社会主义国家政权中已经定型。然而中国持续的经济、社会以及政治层面的转型却否定了"后共产主义终结"这一理论,因而即使是在抛弃苏联式社会主义体系的二十年之后,"后共产主义"仍不是一个多余的概念。相反,在东亚和东、中欧的比较研究中,重视"实际存在的社会主义"的过去,并将它作为一个实质性的解释变量,能显著地增进我们对转型国家多样化轨迹和形式的理解。Some scholars believe that the term ＂post-communism＂ is already out of date as the results of transition in those European socialist regimes have already been finalized. However, China’s continuing economic, social and political transition has denied the theory of ＂ending in post-communism＂. Therefore, even two decades after the Soviet-style socialist system was abandoned, the concept of ＂post-communism＂ is still not superfluous. In contrast, in comparative studies on East Asia, East and Central Europe, laying emphasis on the past of ＂actually existing socialism＂ and taking it as a substantive explanatory variable will significantly advance our understanding in diverse trajectories and forms of transition countries.

关 键 词：后共产主义 后-后共产主义 社会理论 

分 类 号：D50[政治法律—政治学]