检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学新闻与传播学院,北京102249 [2]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872
出 处:《徐州工程学院学报(社会科学版)》2012年第2期10-15,共6页Journal of Xuzhou Institute of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
摘 要:赋予律师侦查讯问过程中的在场权,是侦查程序改革的关键议题之一。西方国家在"保卫人权、制约公权力"的理念支撑下,已经践行"侦查讯问程序中的律师在场权"。在相关理论与实践方面,我国均显不足与滞后,相关争议与舆情越显紧迫。立足我国国情,批判性地参鉴西方国家相关制度与实践中的普适元素,加强这方面的理论研究,为后期的制度设计、法治理念宣传、配套措施的完善及准确试点提供思维导引与智力支持,最大限度地实现法治社会中的公平与正义。To endow a lawyer with the presence right in the process of investigation and interrogation is a key issue in the reform of investigation and interrogation procedure. The western countries, guided by the concept of "defending human rights and restricting public authority", have been practicing the "lawyer presence right in the procedure of investigation and interrogation". In terms of both theory and practice, China has lagged far behind, hence the urgency in debate and public opinion. Based on China's present state of affairs, this paper is to make some theoretical explorations, with reference to the universal elements in the corresponding institutions and practice of western countries, in order to provide conceptual and intel- lectual support for future institution construction, promotion of concepts of law, and the improvement of related measures.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.48