检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《遵义师范学院学报》2012年第1期55-58,共4页Journal of Zunyi Normal University
基 金:遵义师范学院科研基金项目资助(11ky04)
摘 要:Grice的合作原则与会话含义理论没有说明人们为什么要违反合作原则,Leech的礼貌原则对合作原则违反的解释存在明显不足。通过对不同目的关系下违反合作原则的现象进行分析发现,造成合作原则违反的原因主要有交际能力的不足、目的关系的冲突和修辞目的的需要。说明在交际能力许可的情况下,会话双方的目的关系和发话者的修辞目的是合作原则违反的决定因素。从而得出在交际能力许可的情况下,会话目的是合作原则违反的决定因素的结论。Grice's Cooperative Principle and Conversational Implicature theory does not explain why people violate the maxims of CP. Leech's Principle of Politeness is apparently insufficient in explaining the violation of CP. Analysis of various phenomena of the violation of CP in different purpose relationships reveal the three basic causes of the violation of CP including the insufficiency of communication competence, the conflict of purposes and the rhetorical purpose, which indicates that the purpose relationship between the two sides of the conversation and the rhetorical purpose of the speaker are the decisive factors of the violation of CP on condition of the permission of the communication competence. Therefore, it can be" concluded that the purpose of the conversation is the determinant of the violation of CP on condition of the permission of the communication competence.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43