检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]吉林省武装警察总队医院,吉林省长春市130028 [2]吉林大学交通学院,吉林省长春市130022 [3]吉林大学中日联谊医院,吉林省长春市130031 [4]吉林大学南岭校区工程力学系,吉林省长春市130022
出 处:《中国组织工程研究》2012年第9期1605-1608,共4页Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
摘 要:背景:骨力学是生物力学的分支,研究内外固定器固定骨折后的生物力学特性是评价固定效果的重要方法之一。目的:比较3种内外固定器械固定胫骨骨折后骨的应力松弛特性。方法:模拟胫骨骨折分别以髓内钉,钢板,外固定支架进行固定。在电子万能试验机上对3组标本进行轴向压缩应力松弛实验。结果与结论:从各组内、外固定标本轴向压缩应力松弛曲线可以看出,外固定支架组7200s应力松弛量大于钢板和髓内钉组,但差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)。初步表明股骨颈骨折钢板固定、髓内钉固定、外固定支架固定后对骨的应力松弛特性影响基本一致。BACKGROUND:Bone mechanics is a branch of biomechanics.Biomechanical property research of fractures after internal and external fixation is an important method to estimate the fixed-effects.OBJECTIVE:To compare the stress relaxation properties of tibial fractures fixed by three different internal and external fixation devices.METHODS:The simulated tibial fractures were fixed by the intramedullary nails,plate,and external fixation respectively.Axial compression stress relaxation experiment was performed in the specimens of the three groups using electronic universal testing machine.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Axial compression stress relaxation curves of the specimens fixed with internal and external fixation in each group showed that the stress relaxation at 7 200 s in the external fixation group was higher than those of the plate fixation group and the intramedullary nail fixation group,but the differences were not significant (P〉0.05).The results preliminary showed that the effects of plate fixation,intramedullary nail fixation,and external fixation on stress relaxation property of bone in femoral neck fractures were similar.
关 键 词:外固定支架 外固定 髓内钉 钢板 内固定 应力松弛 对比分析
分 类 号:R318[医药卫生—生物医学工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49