化学法与免疫法测定便潜血的临床应用评价  

The Comparison Between the Chemical Method and Immunogold Method in Detecting Sedoccult Blood

作　　者：段相远 

机构地区：[1]河南省商丘市梁园区谢集镇中心卫生院,商丘476000

出　　处：《按摩与康复医学》2012年第9期26-26,共1页Chinese Manipulation and Rehabilitation Medicine

摘　　要：目的：探讨粪便潜血二种检测方法的优劣和应用。方法：用邻联甲苯（O-tolidine）法和免疫肢体金法分别检测300例粪便标本进行对照实验并分析。结果：二种方法测得结果一致性符合率在90％以上。结论：受饮食影响因素，化学法灵敏度、特异性较免疫胶体金法低；免疫胶体金法有假阴性结果，故建议二者结合判断。Objective：To explore the comparability between the chemical method and immunogold method in detecting sed occult blood. Methods： To detect the sed occult blood of 300 specimens with both O--tolidine method and immunogold method, then analyse the results. Results：2 kinds of methods in line with the consistency of the results of the measured rate of greater than 90%. Conclusion：Food and drink impact the results of chemical method very much. so chemical method is ]esssensitive and specific than immunogold method. But immunogold method also has false positivereaction, therefore we suggest detecting sed occult blood with the both two methods.

关 键 词：大便潜血 邻联甲苯胺法 免疫胶体金 

分 类 号：R4[医药卫生—临床医学]