检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《四川医学》2012年第3期494-495,共2页Sichuan Medical Journal
摘 要:目的探讨新生儿黄疸间歇蓝光照射治疗与持续蓝光照射治疗的临床疗效。方法两组患儿予以临床常规治疗的基础上,分别予以间歇蓝光照射和持续蓝光照射治疗相同时间3d,结束时比较两组的新生儿黄疸的疗效及不良反应的发生率。结果两种蓝光照射方法对两组新生儿黄疸的疗效不存在统计学意义(P>0.05),但不良反应的发生率有差异,间歇蓝光照射优于持续蓝光照射(P<0.05)。结论新生儿黄疸间歇蓝光照射与持续蓝光照射的临床治疗效果无明显差异,但不良反应明显减少,对临床治疗有借鉴意义。Objective To investigate blue-ray irradiation of intermittent and continuous phototherapy treatment of neonatal jaundice and adverse effects.Methods Two groups of neonatal jaundice infants were based on clinical routine therapy with intermittent and continuous blue-ray.We compared curative effect and adverse reaction of the two groups at the end of the study.Results The clinical effects of two groups showed no significant difference(P0.05);however,the group of intermittent blue light adverse reaction was lower(P0.05).Conclusion The clinical effects of neonatal jaundice with intermittent and continuous blue-ray irradiation was no obvious difference,but adverse reactions of intermittent blue-ray irradiation treatment was significantly reduced.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46