2001至2010年《中华儿科杂志》刊出论文被引情况分析  

Cited status and its correlated factors of articles published in Chinese Journal of Pediatrics from 2001 to 2010

作　　者：付晓霞[1] 张秀梅[2] 李婧[3] 程煜华[3] 徐建武[3] 李贵存[1] 

机构地区：[1]中华医学会《中华儿科杂志》编辑部,北京100710 [2]中国科学技术信息研究所,北京100038 [3]北京万方数据股份有限公司,100038

出　　处：《中华儿科杂志》2012年第3期206-210,共5页Chinese Journal of Pediatrics

摘　　要：目的 探讨《中华儿科杂志》刊出论文的被引用情况.方法 检索万方数据医学网中《中华儿科杂志》2001至2010年发表的论文,及其被引频次、栏目、基金资助情况,分析其与论文被引的关系.结果 2001至2010年,《中华儿科杂志》共刊出论文3209篇,其中2073篇被引用,被引论文占全部论文的64.60％,总被引频次为18 546次,篇均被引5.78次.各栏目中,“标准·方案·指南”栏目刊出的文章篇均被引频次最高,为62.92次；重点号论文,包括述评（7.12次/篇）、专论（6.50次/篇）、论著的被引用情况均较好,篇均被引频次（7.90次）高于普通论著（6.03次）.有明确学术观点的评论性论文,例如“观点·争鸣·讨论”栏目刊出的文章被引情况也较好,篇均被引频次为7.09次；“快速通道”论文100％被引用,篇均被引频次达到16.20次.基金资助论文被引频次没有明显优势,基金资助论文篇均被引频次为4.81次,低于全部论文的篇均5.78次,更低于非基金论文的篇均6.06次,略高于去除“标准·方案·指南”栏目后的非基金论文篇均被引4.36次.结论 不同栏目的被引情况差异较大.应进一步加强约稿,增加评论性文章、高质量的论著的数量.基金资助论文和非基金资助论文,应该采用相同的取舍标准.Objective The present study was designed to explore the cited status and its correlated factors of articles published in Chinese Journal of Pediatrics. Method Articles published in Chinese Journal of Pediatrics from 2001 to 2010 were searched using Wanfang Medical Online database,and the relationship between cited number and column and funding status were analyzed. Results Totally 3209articles were published by Chinese Journal of Pediatrics from 2001 to 2010.Two thousand and seventy-three articles （64.60% ） were cited.The total cited number was 18 546 （mean rate：5.78 per paper）.Standard/protocol/guideline was the most often cited column （mean rate：62.92 per paper）. Featured articles including editorials （ mean rate：7.12 per paper）,special articles （ mean rate：6.50 per paper） and original articles （ mean rate：7.90 per paper） had higher cited rate.Cited rate of original papers in featured articles was higher than other original articles （ mean rate：6.03 per paper）. Those with academic perspectives,such as Opinion/Debate/Discussion,were well cited （mean rate：7.09 per paper）.All of original articles in Rapid Pathway were well cited （mean rate：16.20 per paper）. Mean cited number of grant-supported articles was 4.81 per paper,lower than that of all kinds of papers （mean rate：5.78 per paper） and nongrant-supported articles （mean rate：6.06 per paper）.However,it was slightly higher than that of articles except Standard/protocol/guideline （mean rate：4.36 per paper）.Conclusion Cited status varies among columns.The invited papers should be increased in number to raise commentary papers and original articles with high quality.Grant-supported or non-grant-supported papers should be reviewed based on the same standard after submission.

关 键 词：文献计量学 期刊 被引频次 

分 类 号：G2[文化科学] GG25