汉、藏因明比较研究刍议  

A Comparative Study of Chinese Hetuvidyā and Tibetan Hetuvidyā

作　　者：郑伟宏[1] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学古籍整理研究所,上海200433

出　　处：《复旦学报（社会科学版）》2012年第2期72-79,共8页Fudan Journal（Social Sciences）

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"佛教逻辑研究"(项目批准号:06JJD7204002)的系列成果之一

摘　　要：我国的汉传因明和藏传因明分别传承了印度的陈那因明和法称因明。百年来国内外因明界对陈那因明的误解,直接影响到汉、藏因明的比较研究。必须如实地还原玄奘的因明成就,弘扬汉传因明中保存的陈那学说的原貌,以回应某些藏传学者的诸多疑问。The Chinese Hetuvidyā inherits that of Dignāga in India,while Dharmakīrti＇s logic comes down to the Tibetan one.The hundred years＇ misinterpretation of the logic characteristic of Dignāga＇s Hetuvidyā has influenced the comparative studies of Chinese and Tibetan Hetuvidyā.This article concentrates on a faithful description of Xuanzang＇s achievement in Hetuvidyā,brings into light the original features of Dignāga＇s theory,which are preserved in Chinese Hetuvidyā,and responds to various doubts of some scholars who study principally on Tibetan Hetuvidyā.

关 键 词：汉传因明 藏传因明 陈那 玄奘 法称 

分 类 号：B948[哲学宗教—宗教学]