基于《国家学生体质健康标准》的中国大学生心血管耐力水平评价标准研究  被引量:1

Base on "NPHSS" Examining Cardiovascular Endurance Assessment Criteria for Chinese College Students

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:邵金艇[1] 王美燕[2] 

机构地区:[1]浙江财经学院体军部,浙江杭州310018 [2]浙江财经学院东方学院体育中心,浙江杭州314408

出  处:《浙江体育科学》2012年第2期116-119,共4页Zhejiang Sport Science

摘  要:监测和提高心血管系统的耐力水平是当前我国高校体育教学的一个重要目标,也是《国家学生体质健康标准》(以下简称《标准》)测试内容的重要组成部分。心血管耐力评价标准使用台阶试验(改良后的哈佛台阶试验)和中跑(1 000m/男,800m/女),两者在《标准》评价下是同一模块内容,也就是可以进行等同测试。研究的样本采自我国东部的一所综合性大学,使用了平衡样本,样本数N=978,其中男女各489人,将测试结果在《标准》的评价模式下,采用百分制得分计算,然后使用描述性与推论性统计进行分析:男性平均得分中跑75.85±14.886和台阶试验66.34±17.145;女性分别为74.30±15.323和72.35±9.374。独立样本T检验表明,男性在台阶试验上的得分差异性显著(p<0.05)强于女性在中跑得分上的差异性(p<0.05),通过配对样本T检验,我们发现男性在中跑上的得分与在台阶上的得分具有非常显著性差异(p=0.000<0.01),女性无显著性差异(P=0.014>0.01)。实验结果表明:等同测试的项目的台阶试验和中跑在评价标准上并不相同,研究试图在实验数据的基础上运用统计学方法,修订本模块测试标准,为决策者提供参考。Improving and monitoring student cardiovascular endurance is an important goal for college physical education in China(National Physical Health Standards for Students,2007).This study examined the cardiovascular endurance assessment criteria using Harvard Step Test(HST) and Running Tests(RT;1,000/800 meters for males/females),both selected by NPHSS as equivalent optional tests.A balanced sample(N=978) including 489 females from a comprehensive university in eastern China completed the HST and RT in physical education within two weeks.Both tests were administered using the standardized procedures described in NPHSS,and subsequently the test scores were converted into percentile scores according to NPHSS(2007).We analyzed the percentile scores using descriptive and inferential statistics.On average,males scored 75.85±14.886 in HST,and 66.34±17.145 in RT;females scored 74.30±15.323 in HST,and 72.35±9.374 in RT,respectively.Independent sample T test showed that males scored significantly higher in HST(p0.05) but lower in RT(p0.05) than females.When comparing the percentile scores between HST and RT within the same sex,Paired sample T tests showed there was significant difference in both males and females' test cores(p0.05) with RT producing significantly higher percentile scores than HST.The results suggest that even though HST and RT are recommended as equivalent tests in NPHSS,they are not equivalent in that RT generated favoring scores overall for males and HST generating favoring scores.Future studies should further examine these tests,and suggest for standard/test revisions as appropriate.

关 键 词:心血管耐力 评价标准 高校体育 

分 类 号:G804.2[文化科学—运动人体科学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象