肱骨干骨折两种固定术疗效比较  

Humeral shaft fracture surgery Comparison of efficacy of two fixed

作　　者：张进[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川省绵阳市中心医院,四川绵阳621000

出　　处：《吉林医学》2012年第9期1799-1800,共2页Jilin Medical Journal

摘　　要：目的:比较微创钢板固定与带锁髓内针固定术治疗肱骨干骨折的临床疗效。方法:对肱骨干骨折患者分别采用微创钢板固定术和带锁髓内针固定术,观察临床疗效。结果:微创钢板固定组患者的手术时间、术中出血量明显大于带锁髓内针固定术组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);而两组在骨折愈合时间及关节功能恢复评分方面,则差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:两种手术治疗方式对治疗肱骨干骨折均可取得良好的临床效果,但带锁髓内针固定术耗时相对较短,术中出血量相对较小。Objective To compare the minimally invasive plate fixation and intramedullary pin fixation for humeral fracture treatment.Methods From humeral shaft fractures were treated in recent years were used in patients with minimally invasive plate fixation and intramedullary pin fixation,observed clinical efficacy.Results Of minimally invasive plate fixation group of patients with operative time,blood loss was significantly greater than the intramedullary pin fixation group,all have a statistically significant difference（P0.05）;the two groups in fracture healing and joint functional recovery score is concerned,the difference was not statistically significant（P0.05）.Conclusion Of two surgical treatments for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures can achieve good clinical results,but time-consuming and intramedullary pin fixation relatively short,blood loss is relatively small.

关 键 词：肱骨干骨折 微创钢板固定 带锁髓内针固定术 临床观察 疗效对比 

分 类 号：R687.3[医药卫生—骨科学]