检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈爱贞[1]
机构地区:[1]厦门大学经济学院国际经济与贸易系,福建厦门361005
出 处:《经济管理》2012年第4期29-38,共10页Business and Management Journal ( BMJ )
基 金:厦门大学国际经济与贸易系教育发展基金项目"中国本土企业自主创新的战略转变:基于国际分工地位的理论;实证与对策"(201112101)
摘 要:中国下游行业融入国际分工的进程要早于装备制造业,随着国际产业竞争呈现出标准许可化的发展趋势,引入技术及其标准成为中国下游行业参与国际分工的重要条件。而随着上下游产业间技术关联加强,国际技术标准的垄断逐渐具有产业链捆绑效应,造成中国上游本土设备企业发展空间和自主创新受限。本文构建数学模型,分析了控制下游技术标准专利的跨国公司,通过在上游不同附加值环节有选择性地拒绝或放开授权,制约本土设备企业发展和创新的机制。实证分析进一步验证,下游技术标准受控于跨国公司所造成的中国通信设备制造业不同环节的非平衡发展,竞争效应和资源挤出效应制约了本土通信设备企业的自主创新。为此,需要通过产业链上下游合作来突破技术标准的捆绑约束。International industrial transfer upgraded step by step along the "consumer goods - consumer elec- tronics-equipment manufacturing". It is also the course of China's industries participating in the international divi- sion of labor. So in China downstream industries participated in international division of labor earlier than machiner- y industries. With international competition showing the trend of standard license, China's downstream industries had to introduce technology and standards from multinational enterprises. Then with downstream-upstream technolo- gy association enhanced, the technology of upstream industries must be compatible with the downstream, therefore upstream industries such as machinery industries had to follow downstream to introduce technology and standards from multinational enterprises. It means that multinational enterprises with international technical standards in an industry can control other related industries through technology association. From the perspective of technology association of industrial chain, we can understand why China's machinery industries have been in the plight of coexistence of high growth and low capacity for independent innovation in a long time. This paper builds a model to study how multinational enterprises controlling downstream technical standards re- fuse to license patents in upstream high value-added sectors, and relax license in upstream low value-added sec- tors, which induce more local firms of machinery industries to enter low value-added sectors. Fierce competition will lower profit and stifle innovation in low value-added sectors. And resource crowding-out effect will make local firms in high value-added sectors lack resource support for innovation. Empirical analysis based on China's telecommunication equipment manufacturing industry shows that because of big gap of technology China's information and communication industry had to introduce technical standards of 1G and 2G from Europe and America. In order to be compatible with the
分 类 号:F062.9[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117