子宫颈癌根治术后患者自主排尿功能恢复的时间探讨及护理  

The Exploration and Care of the Recovery time of Self-voiding Function for Patients with Cervical Cancer after Surgery

作　　者：谭宁红 曹红军 李玲 

机构地区：[1]攀钢总医院护理部,四川攀枝花617023

出　　处：《中国伤残医学》2012年第3期18-20,共3页Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine

摘　　要：目的:对比探讨子宫颈癌根治术后患者自主排尿功能恢复的时间探讨及护理方法。方法:将我院近期收治确诊的子宫颈癌根治术后患者88例分成2组,其中实验组48例行综合护理干预,对照组40例行常规护理干预。对所有患者进行2～3个月的随访,对比2组患者的临床疗效,残余尿量及尿储留发生率,抑郁状态量表(SDS)和焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分变化。结果:2组间相比,实验组患者的残余尿量及尿储留发生率、SDS和SAS评分均优于对照组(p<0.05),且实验组患者临床疗效的总有效率为95.8%,高于对照组的85.0%(P<0.05)。结论:在子宫颈癌根治术后运用综合护理干预,临床效果显著,能够显著减少患者的残余尿量及尿储留发生率,并通过一系列生理作用,提高患者的临床疗效,以便使其负性心理减轻。Objective： To compare the exploration and care of the recovery time of self-voiding function for patients with cervical cancer after surgery. Methods： 88 patients admitted to our hospital for the diagnosis of cervical cancer recently were randomly divided into two groups. The experimental group of 48 cases was taken with comprehensive nursing intervention, and the control group of 40 cases was given conventional nursing intervention. Take 2-3 months follow-up for all patients, the clinical effcacy, residual urine volume and urinary retention incidence of depression scale （SDS） and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale （SAS） score changes of the two groups were compared. Results： Compared between the two groups, the residual urine volume and urinary reservoir remain the incidence of SDS and SAS scores in the experimental group of patients were better than the control group （p 〈0.05）, and clinical efficacy of the experimental group was 95.8% higher than the control group of 85.0% （P 〈0.05）.Conclusions： The clinical effect for radical resection of the use of the comprehensive nursing intervention in cervical cancer was significant, can significantly reduce the patient＇s residual urine volume and urinary retention incidence. By a series of physiological effects, it can improve the clinical efficacy of patients in order to make it to the lowest in the negative aspect.

关 键 词：子宫颈癌根治术 自主排尿功能 综合护理干预 

分 类 号：R473[医药卫生—护理学]