检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡粟[1] 胡春洪[1] 张京刚[1] 张敏鸽[1] 王芳芳[1] 邢建明[1] 陈剑华[1]
机构地区:[1]苏州大学附属第一医院影像中心,江苏苏州215006
出 处:《磁共振成像》2012年第1期44-47,共4页Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
摘 要:目的比较不同ROI设置方法对定量评估铁过载家兔模型肝脏铁含量的差异。方法将32只大白兔随机分为4组,三个实验组每周注射铁剂一次。之后对所有实验兔进行MRR2-StarMap数据采集和铁含量分析。由两名放射科医师分别采用全肝ROI和设置多个小的ROI求平均值两种方法测得肝脏的R2*值。结果两种ROI选取方法在不同观察者之间均存在较好的一致性(P>0.05,ICC=0.99)。全肝ROI法所测得的R2*值较小ROI平均值法所测者偏低(P<0.05)。结论磁共振-R2*对肝过载铁含量的分析,全肝ROI测量较小ROI测量更可靠。Objective: To compare the differences of two kinds of ROI measurements of MRI liver R2* with iron overload, Materials and methods: Thirty-two adult healthy New Zealand rabbits were randomly divided into 4 groups, with 3 groups received intravenous injection of Iron Sucrose with different concentrations every 1 week for 4 weeks. After liver scan was performed by 3.0T MR scanner with 2D MFGRE sequence, the animals were sent for LIC assessment immediately. The R26* value were measured on R2^* Map with whole liver and small region-of interest (ROI) selection by 2 observers, independently. The R2^* value was compared between intra- and inter-observer; from the whole liver and the ROI, respectively. Results: The data from 2 types of measurement was consistent (P〉0.05, ICC=0.99). The R2^* value measured from the whole liver was smaller than that of ROI selection (P〈0.05). Conclusion: To analyze the over-loaded liver by MR1 R2^*, the whole liver measurement is superior to the ROI positioning.
分 类 号:R445.2[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R333.4[医药卫生—诊断学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3