“舆情再审”:司法决策的困境与出路  

Judicial Decision-making's Dilemma and Solution:Introspecting the Retrials by Public Opinions

作　　者：徐阳[1] 

机构地区：[1]辽宁大学法学院

出　　处：《中国法学》2012年第2期180-191,共12页China Legal Science

基　　金：国家社科基金资助课题<交涉正义的价值与实践--和谐社会理念关照下的交涉性刑事司法>的阶段性成果;项目号为08CFX038

摘　　要：李昌奎案件作为"舆情再审"的典型样本,引发我们对司法决策中舆情风险的思考。在形式合理性法治中,司法与以社会舆论为载体的民意冲突不可避免。在中国社会转型期的构建型法治推进中,死刑案件的司法决策便是舆情风险的高发地带。由于司法权威尚未牢固树立,中国司法机关的舆情风险承受能力较弱。化解司法决策中的舆情风险的根本出路在于树立司法权威,而在当下,为实现对已有司法权威的存量保护,强化司法与社会诉讼过程中的沟通机制,尤为重要。Li Changkui case,as a typical sample of retrial by public opinions,makes us consider the risk of public opinions in judicial decision-making.If the modality of rule of law is reasonable,the conflict between justice and public opinions will be inevitable.At the time of promoting the rule of law in China＇s transitional period,judicial decision-making about death sentence is easy to cause the risk of public opinions.At present,judicial authority has not been firmly established in China,and thus the risk tolerance of Chinese judicial authorities is weak.The fundamental approach to defusing the risk of public opinions in the judicial decision-making is to foster the judicial authority in China.

关 键 词：司法决策 舆情再审 舆情风险 司法权威 

分 类 号：D926[政治法律—法学]