再论汉语动结式的补语小句理论分析--兼与谢都全、郭应可先生商榷  

On the Resultative Small Clause Analysis of Resultative Verb Compound in Chinese——A Reply to XIE Duquan and GUO Yingke

作　　者：彭国珍[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江工业大学外国语学院,浙江杭州310023

出　　处：《外国语》2012年第2期38-45,共8页Journal of Foreign Languages

摘　　要：本文就"汉语结果结构的小句分析评述及其新模式"一文中提到的汉语动结式补语小句分析存在的问题进行了讨论。本文认为原文在解读结果补语小句理论的时候存在一些误解。小句分析法认为补语小句主语和主句动词没有题元关系,只和小句谓语有主谓关系。这种分析不但不存在过度生成,相反解释力更强,并且不用为各类动结式特设不同解释,并把动结式及物性结构、不及物性结构和把字句统一起来。The paper mainly discusses the problems with resuhative small clause analysis as pointed out in ＂Comment on the Small Clause Approach to Chinese Resuhative Constructions and a New Model＂ XIE Duquan and GUO Yingke. It is found that Xie ＆ Guo have some misunderstandings about the theory it eriticises. In the resultative small clause analysis, the subject of the small clause does not have any thematic relationship with the matrix verb, but only subject-predicate relationship with the predicate of the small clause. This line of analysis explains the syntactic behavior of Chinese resultative verb compound （ RVC ） and does not have the problem of over-generation. In addition, it offers a unified account of the transitive form, intransitive form and BA construction of RVCs.

关 键 词：结果补语小句 动结式 题元关系 

分 类 号：H146[语言文字—汉语]