检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周淑娟[1] 金珍琳[1] 沈志坚[1] 梁彬[1] 孙岚[1] 江松福[1] 俞康[1]
机构地区:[1]温州医学院附属第一医院血液科,浙江温州325000
出 处:《中华医院感染学杂志》2012年第7期1364-1366,共3页Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
摘 要:目的探讨恶性血液病患者化疗后肠源性败血症的危险因素。方法对肠源性败血症患者采用病例对照研究方法,进行单因素和多因素logistic分析。结果恶性血液病患者化疗后使用质子泵抑制剂(PPI)的比未使用的肠源性败血症发生率(82.4%)高(P=0.000);而糖尿病、病毒性肝炎、糖皮质激素治疗、粒细胞缺乏时间、抗菌药物使用两组之间比较,差异无统计学意义;单因素研究发现,仅PPI的使用差异有统计学意义(OR=0.343,P=0.485);多因素研究发现,PPI的使用是肠源性败血症的独立危险因素(P=0.00,r=0.485)。结论 PPI的使用与恶性血液病患者化疗后肠源性败血症有关。OBJECTIVE To explore the risk factors for gut-derived sepsis in patients with hematologic malignancies after chemotherapy. METHODS A retrospective case-control study was performed. The data were analyzed by monovariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Higher incidence of gut-derived sepsis (82.40%) was found in the patients with hematologic malignancies who used PPI after chemotherapy than in those who did not use PPI (P=0. 000). The differences in diabetes, viral hepatitis, gtucocorticoid treatment, duration of agranulocytosis, and the use of antibiotics between the two groups were not statistically significant; univariate analysis showed that only the difference in use of PPI has statistical significance (OR = O. 343, P = 0. 485). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the use of PPI was the independent factor for gut-derived sepsis (P=0.00,r= 0. 485). CONCLUSION The use of PPI is associated with gut-derived sepsis in patients with hematologic malignancies after chemotherapy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.141.38.11