检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汤凌燕[1]
机构地区:[1]福建农林大学人文社会科学学院,福建福州350002
出 处:《福建农林大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2012年第2期82-85,共4页Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
摘 要:滑稽模仿近年来逐渐在我国流行,其表现形式多种多样,与滑稽模仿有关的纠纷也崭露头角。但从我国现有的法律制度来看,尚缺乏对滑稽模仿的法律定位,滑稽模仿者与原作品作者之间的权利、利益纠葛一直无法得到很好解决。分析了滑稽模仿行为的构成要件及该类行为的合法性理由,建议在现有著作权合理使用制度中增加一项内容,即专门针对滑稽模仿行为进行规定,确认其合法性,以达到促进社会文化事业发展的效果。Parody became increasingly popular in China in recent years,its performance was in various forms,and parody-related disputes are now budding.However,there is still a lack of legal status of parody in the existing legal systems in China,and the disputes between parodists and authors about rights and interests have not yet been able to be resolved in a satisfactory way.In this paper,according to the analysis of components of parody behavior and its legality reasons,it is proposed to add an item to the present system of rational implementation of copyright to regulate the parody behaviors and confirm their legality,so as to accelerate the development of social cultural undertaking.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.158