检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡卫国[1] 李建兴[1] 杨波[1] 黄晓波[1] 王晓峰[1]
出 处:《临床泌尿外科杂志》2012年第4期267-269,273,共4页Journal of Clinical Urology
摘 要:目的:探讨应用经皮顺行腔内切开术(PAE)治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻(UPJO)的适应症、疗效及技巧。方法:UPJO患者75例,其中肾盂输尿管连接部(UPJ)闭锁26例(34.7%)。男38例,女37例,平均年龄35(21~68)岁。左侧31例,右侧44例。原发性UPJO 39例(合并结石37例),开放UPJO成形术后8例,腹腔镜UPJO成形术后4例,开放手术取石术后14例,PCNL术后10例。均经B超、KUB、IVU、CT、逆行肾盂造影检查确诊。结果:Ⅰ期成功内切开69例(92.0%),4例(5.3%)间隔1周后Ⅱ期手术成功,2例放弃Ⅱ期治疗。单一应用PAE 59例(80.8%),PAE联合输尿管镜逆行内切开14例(19.2%)。术后3~6个月拔除输尿管支架管,随访6个月时,62例(84.9%)无复发,复发患者11例(15.1%)中包括UPJ闭锁患者10例。随访12个月时,55例(75.3%)无复发,24个月时52例(71.2%)无复发。21例复发患者中,9例行第二次PAE手术治愈,2例行第三次PAE手术后治愈,1例行开放肾盂成形术,9例每3~6个月更换双J管或动态观察。结论:PAE可以作为原发性UPJO的一线治疗。继发性UPJO或其他成形术后再狭窄的UPJO复发率高,但是PAE适用范围广,可重复性好,仍然是微创腔内治疗的有效手段。Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of percutaneous endopyelotomy (PAE) in the minimally t invasive treatmentof ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Method; Between June 200g and August 2010, 75 patients of UPJO had undergone PAE. Clinical data were analyzed retrospectively. Success was defined as both ra- diographic and symptomatic improvement, ltesult: Sixty-nine(92. 0%) patients were operated in one session of PAE, and 4 needed second session of PAE, 2 abandoned further treatment. Single PAE operations were per formed in 59(80.8%) patients. Combined antegrade and retrograde endopyelotomy were performed in 14(19.2~) patients. 65 patients were treated by electrocautery endopyelotomy, 5 by holmium laser, 3 by cold knife. The esti-- mated 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months recurrence-free survival rates for the endopyelotomy group were 84.9%, 75.3%, and 71.2%, respectively. Conclusion:PAE is effective for treatment of UPJO, while the recur- rence rate for secondary UPJO and those failed other treatment modality is high.
关 键 词:肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻 内窥镜术 手术
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3