检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京科技大学土木与环境工程学院,北京100083 [2]清华大学环境学院,北京100084 [3]北京化工大学,北京100084
出 处:《安徽农业科学》2012年第11期6756-6759,6791,共5页Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences
基 金:环保部规划院科技计划项目(2010A038)
摘 要:案例分析能源生态型沼气工程、能源环保型沼气工程和发酵床技术的工艺类型,比较3种工程的经济效益、技术效益和环境效益。沼气工程前期投资大,但大型能源生态型沼气工程可以通过丰富再生能源获得收益,能源环保型沼气工程相对于能源生态型沼气工程投资大、收益小,发酵床技术可以实现畜禽粪便"零排放",但菌剂费用造成高额运行费用。建议加强大型生态型沼气工程发展,增强发酵床菌剂的研究以降低发酵床运行成本,推动有机肥市场的有效运行。The process types of energy ecological biogas project,energy environmental protection biogas project and fermentation bed were analyzed with cases.The economic benefit,technical feedback and environmental benefits of three projects were compared.The investment of biogas project was big,but large-scale energy ecological biogas project can earn profit through renewable sources of energy,the energy environmental protection biogas project had more investment and less benefit than ecological one.Fermentation bed can realize "zero release",but cost on fungicides make high operating cost.It was suggested that strengthen the engineering development of large-scale energy ecological biogas project,enhance the studying of fungicides in order to reduce operating cost of fermentation bed and push forward the marketable of organic fertilizer.
分 类 号:S216.3[农业科学—农业机械化工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3