检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]天津医科大学一中心临床学院,300192 [2]天津市第一中心医院
出 处:《中华器官移植杂志》2012年第4期220-224,共5页Chinese Journal of Organ Transplantation
基 金:天津市卫生局科技基金(07KY27);天津市卫生局攻关课题(11KG102)
摘 要:目的探讨肾移植受者细胞色素P450酶(CYP)3A5*3、CYP3A4*18B和CYP3A5-CYP3A4单倍型对他克莫司(Tac)药动学的影响。方法采用DNA测序法检测61例肾移植受者CYP3A5*3和CYP3A4*18B基因型。酶联免疫吸附试验测定受者的血Tac浓度,比较术后14d和1、2、3个月时不同基因型受者之间血Tac浓度谷值(G0)、Tac剂量(D)及浓度/剂量(G0/D)的差异。结果61例中,CYP3A5*3和CYP3A4*18B等位基因突变频率分别为74.6%和26.2%。当CYP3A5表达(*1/*1+*1/*3)者的D是CYP3A5未表达(*3/*3)者的1.3~1.6倍时,未表达者的G,却是表达者的1.1~1.5倍,G,/D是表达者的1.8~2.4倍。CYP3A4*18B(*1/*18B及*1813/*18B)基因型者的D是CYP3A4*1/*1基因型者的1.2~1.5倍时,*1/*1基因型者的G,是*18B基因型者的1.2~1.4倍,G0/D是*18B基因型者的1.5~1.8倍。当CYP3A5-CYP3A4(A~AA)者的D是CYP3A5-CYP3A4(GpGG)者的1.3~1.7倍时,GG-GG的G,是AA-AA的1.5~2倍,G0/D是AA-AA的2.5~3倍。当受者G0/D分别位于中位数上下时,CYP3A5、CYP3A4不同基因型和CYP3A5-CYP3A4不同单倍型受者的分布差异较大。结论肾移植受者CYP3A5*3和CYP3A4*18B基因多态性对Tac的药动学有显著影响,对CYP3A5-CYP3A4单倍型的分析比单独考虑一种基因型影响更为显著。Objective To retrospectively investigate the effects of CYP3A5 * 3, CYP3A4 * 18B and CYP3A5-CYP3A4 phenotype on the G0, D and G*/D of tacrolimus (Tae) in renal transplantation recipients. Methods The CYP3A5 * 3 and CYP3A4 * 18B genotypes of the 61 patients were detected by DNA direct sequencing, and the G0 was detected by ELISA. The differences of G0, D and G0/D on the day 14, and month 1, 2 and 3 after transplantation were compared among different genotypes of recipients treated with Tac. Results The frequency of the CYP3A5 * 3 and CYP3A4 * 1 8B was 74. 6% and 26. 2% respectively. When the D of the recipients with CYP3A5 * 1 ( * 1/* 1 + * 1/* 3) was 1.3-1.6 times to the CYP3A5 * 3/* 3, the G0 of * 3/* 3 group was 1.1-1.5 times to the * 1 group, and the G*/D was 1.8 2. 4 times to the CYP3A5 * 1. For CYP3A4, the D of CYP3A4 * 18B group ( * 1/*- 18B+ * 18B/* 18B) was 1. 2-1.5 times to the CYP3A5 * 1/* 1, but the G* of 1/* 1 was 1.2 1.4 times to the * 18B,the G0/D was 1.5-1.8 times to the * 18B. For the CYP3A5 CYP3A4 phenotype, the D of the recipients with AA-AA was 1.3-1.7 times to the CX3-GG, the G, of GG-GG was 1.5-2 times to the AA-AA, the G0/D of the recipients with GG-GG- was 2. 5 3 times to the AA-AA. In the recipients with G0/D above or below the median of G0/D, the distribution of CYP3A5, CYP3A4 and CYP3AS-CYP3A4 phenotypes was different significantly. Conclusion There is a significant correlation between the CYP3A5, CYP3A4 and pharmacokinetics of Tac. It's more powerful evaluating the CYP3A5-CYP3A4 phenotype rather than just one genotype of the recipients. So detecting the CYP3A5 * 3 and CYP3A4 * 18B genotypes prior to transplantation is meaningful for us to determine an appropriate initial and long-time dosage of Tac.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.45