检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:柳镭[1]
机构地区:[1]湖南理工学院,湖南岳阳414000
出 处:《重庆交通大学学报(社会科学版)》2012年第2期35-39,共5页Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University:Social Sciences Edition
摘 要:反垄断法私人实施制度是一个包含关于适格原告主体资格、证明责任、集团诉讼以及民事责任等各项具体规则在内的整套体系。我国反垄断法私人实施制度的相关法律条款规定得十分原则,在可操作性上存在欠缺,某些具体制度设计仍有一定不足,成为了制约我国反垄断法的价值理念真正落实的障碍,亟待进一步的细化和完善。在此过程中应当注重研究、借鉴和扬弃美国的经验,明确反垄断法实施制度的目标和功能,规则制定要具有科学性、前瞻性。Private anti-trust enforcement is an interrelated system comprising specific rules about plaintiff's qualification, burden of proof, class action and civil liability. The part of China's private antitrust law that regulates antitrust enforcement only consists of very principal provisions, and a lack of operability exists. Some specific design of it is insufficient. This constitutes an obstacle that obstructs the realization of antitrust law's values and needs further refinement and improvement. During the process, special attention should be directed to the experience of the United States, and relevant lessons should be carefully researched. A clear understanding of the objectives and functions of the antitrust enforcement is also needed. Rules should be formulated with a scientific and forward-looking perspective.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.104