有别于法理学的法哲学探源  

On Legal Philosophy Distinguished from Jurisprudence

作　　者：黄杨[1] 

机构地区：[1]中共南通市委党校,南通226007

出　　处：《南通纺织职业技术学院学报》2012年第1期33-39,共7页Journal of Nantong Textile Vocational Technology college

摘　　要：从自然哲学中分化出来的法哲学作为"正义的学说",不但是对"法应当是什么"或"正当法"的问题的讨论和追问,不只是回答什么是"正义"(正当法),而是探究如何才能甄别并实现正当法。这种充满主体性及形而上的法哲学有别于"法律教义学"(法律释义学或法律解释学)——法理学。作为实在法理论的法律教义及其解释学不是"学问",即不是学理探源与追问,而是"学术",即学理释义和致用。法哲学及其"应然"的自然性不应该是实在法学及其判例的研究内容,而是形而上的"学问"。作为一门形而上"学问"的法哲学不是法学分支学科,而是哲学的一个分支学科。As a branch of natural philosophy,the legal philosophy is the science of justice,not only an discussion about and an exploration into the question of ＂what ought the law to be＂,answering the question of ＂what is justice（the ought-to-be law）＂,but also a probe into how to identify and realize the ought-to-be law.The legal philosophy,due to its subjectivity and metaphysics,is different from jurisprudence,i.e.legal dogmatics,or legal interpretation.The legal dogmatics as positive jurisprudence is not academic,not an inquiry into the origin of law,but a learning,or an interpretation of the legal doctrines and their application.Legal philosophy,together with its nature of ought-to-be,should not be the subject of positive jurisprudence research and judicial practice,but a metaphysical study,a branch of philosophy instead of a branch of law.

关 键 词：法哲学 法理学 应然与实然 学问与学术 哲学分支 

分 类 号：N02[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]