检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李全庆[1]
机构地区:[1]西南财经大学,成都611130
出 处:《中国农学通报》2012年第11期215-218,共4页Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
基 金:2009年国家社会科学基金重点项目"中国城乡土地资源开发利用开源节流机制研究"(09ADZ027)
摘 要:为了从伦理视角审视强制拆迁权,找寻治理强制拆迁权的可行路径,通过理论分析方法,深刻剖析强制拆迁是传统专制制度下的伦理诉求的本质,非强制拆迁则是当下政府的直觉伦理认同,从而提出适当拆迁才是目前土地行政伦理缺失境域下的伦理选择。正视目前土地行政伦理缺失的事实、理性选择适当拆迁方式、努力建构土地行政伦理是减少和避免强制拆迁的伦理路径。In order to review the power of forced evictions from an ethical perspective,and find the feasible path to governing the forced evictions power,the article through theoretical analysis,in-depth analysis the ethical demand nature of forced evictions in the traditional authoritarian system,indicates that no-forced evictions was the intuitive ethical identity of the present government,thus proper demolition was present to the ethical choice under the lack of land ethics.Facing the fact that the current lack of land administration ethics,selecting rationally the appropriate demolition method,and constructing land administration ethics were ethical paths to avoid or reduce forced evictions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.48.163