对我国湿地保护地方立法的评析——以《苏州市湿地保护条例》为例  

Progress and Shortcomings of Local Legislation of China's Wetland Protection—Taking Suzhou City Wetland Protection Ordinance As an Example

作　　者：兰家丽[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学王健法学院,江苏苏州215006

出　　处：《常州大学学报（社会科学版）》2012年第2期23-27,共5页Journal of Changzhou University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社科基金重大招标课题(10zd&045)子课题<生态文明政府调节机制研究>的阶段性成果

摘　　要：根据《国际湿地公约》对湿地的定义可知,河流、湖泊、沼泽、珊瑚礁以及水库、鱼(虾)塘、水稻田等人工湿地都应属该公约范畴。现行湿地保护地方立法在我国原有的立法经验基础上将永久性水稻田等人工湿地纳入湿地保护的范围,实现了对湿地的全面保护。生物入侵已给我国造成重大损害,在目前生物入侵防治立法缺位的情况下,地方立法对湿地外来物种的引入作出了严格规定。为了解决环境保护违法成本低的难题,应提高湿地违法行为的处罚额度,并与地方经济水平和行为人的违法所得相结合。According to the definition of wetlands in the International Convention on Wetlands , rivers, lakes, swamps, coral reefs and reservoirs, fish （shrimp） ponds, paddy fields and other artificial wetlands should be considered as wetlands. Based on the previous law experience, the existing wetland protection legislation puts permanent paddy fields into the scope of wetland protection to achieve comprehensive protection of wetlands. Biological invasion has caused significant harm to our country. Lack of the biological invasion control legislation, the local legislation strictly restricts the introduction＇of alien species into wetlands. In order to solve the problem of the low cost of illegal damage to environment, the fines of wetlands damage penalties should be raised, which should be in accordance with the level of local economy and the illegal income of the violator.

关 键 词：湿地保护 地方立法 生态补偿 管理体制 

分 类 号：D922.6[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]