检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:耿武军[1] 唐红丽[1] 刘乐[1] 丁希丽[1] 王权光[1] 徐旭仲[1]
机构地区:[1]温州医学院附属第一医院麻醉科,浙江温州325000
出 处:《中国临床药理学杂志》2012年第4期263-265,共3页The Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
摘 要:目的比较镇痛药物地佐辛、芬太尼、曲马多用于切削痂植皮术后静脉镇痛的效果及安全性。方法择期行切削痂植皮术全麻患者84例,随机分为3组。术毕各组分别静脉注射地佐辛0.1 mg.kg-1,芬太尼0.002 mg.kg-1,曲马多2 mg.kg-1。观察并记录各组VAS评分、Ramsay镇静评分,并进行安全性评价。结果地佐辛组和芬太尼组在0.5,1,4 h观察时段VAS评分明显低于曲马多组(P<0.05);地佐辛组在0.5,1 h观察时段Ramsay镇静评分显著高于芬太尼组和曲马多组(P<0.05);3组均有胃肠道不良反应,组间无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论静脉注射地佐辛0.1 mg.kg-1对烧伤病人切削痂植皮术后安全有效。Objective To explore the effect of three different pain medications when using after shaving or excising eschar in deeply burned patients.Methods84 patients treated with excision of eschar and dermepenthsis of empyrosis were divided into three groups randomly,which were respectively injected with Dezocine 0.1 mg·kg-1,Fentanyl 0.002 mg·kg-1,and Tramadol 2 mg·kg-1 when the surgery was over.Compare the VAS analgesic score,Ramsay sedative score and the side reaction among the three groups.They were recorded within 24 h after operations.ResultsThe VAS scores of dezocine group and fentanyl group were much lower than those of tramadol group at 0.5,1,4 h after operation(P〈0.05).The Ramsay sedative score of dezocine group were much higher than those of fentanyl group and tramadol group at 0.5,1 h after operation(P〈0.05).The patients in three groups all had gastrointestinal side effects without statistics difference(P〉0.05).ConclusionIntravenous dezocine 0.1 mg·kg-1 is effective and safe for deeply burned patients with shaving or excising eschar operation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.99.196