检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宿丰林[1]
机构地区:[1]黑龙江省社会科学院俄罗斯所
出 处:《俄罗斯学刊》2011年第3期58-65,共8页Academic Journal of Russian Studies
摘 要:2004年《中俄国界东段补充协定》的签订,使延续多年的中俄划界谈判终于画上句号,两国边界全线划定。这给中俄两国边民带来了福音,也为本地区乃至整个世界的和平与稳定作出了贡献。中方在谈判中作了重大让步,表现出极大诚意。部分俄罗斯学者曲解条约,歪曲自1689年《尼布楚条约》以来的中俄东段边界形成史,煽动对划界的不满情绪,既不符合中俄两国人民的根本利益,也与历史事实相悖。A supplemental agreement was concluded on the eastern section of the Sino-Russian border in 2004, making the many-year Sino-Russian demarcation negotiations come to the end at last and delimiting their entire common border. This brought glad tidings for the people living on the frontiers and made a contribution to the peace and stability of the local area and even the whole world. In the talks, Chinese party made major concessions and showed an utmost sincerity. Some Russian scholars distorted the agreement, twisted the history of the eastern section formation of the Sino-Russian border since the Treaty of Nerchinsk in 1689 and stired up discontent over the demarcation. It does not accord with the fundamental interests of the Chinese people and Russian people and runs counter to the historical facts.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117