检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:侯艾君[1]
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院世界历史研究所
出 处:《俄罗斯学刊》2011年第3期66-76,共11页Academic Journal of Russian Studies
基 金:教育部人文社会科学基地重大课题<文明模式与俄罗斯外交>(项目批准号08JJDGJW260)的阶段性成果
摘 要:1783年格鲁吉亚成为俄国藩属,并最终归并俄国,成为俄国征服高加索过程中的独特案例,堪称"格鲁吉亚方式"。从20世纪90年代至今,对于归并事件等俄格关系史上一系列重大问题,俄、格双方史学家一直作着截然相反的解读,这种对历史问题的认识分歧反映了两国复杂的关系,也使两国关系进一步恶化。本文试图超越俄、格双方的立场,厘清格鲁吉亚归并俄国的历史事实,分析其实质及意义,对俄、格两国关于这一问题流行的谬误和"神话"进行梳理和辨证。Georgia became a vassal state of Russia in 1783 and it was incorporated into Russia at last as a unique case in the process of Russia conquering Caucasia. That can be rated as "Georgian pattern". From the 1990s of the 20th century upon to now, both Russian and Georgian historians have made an opposite interpretation of a series of matters of grave importance such as the the Georgian incorporation, etc. Different understanding of such historical issues reflects a complicated relationship between Georgia and Russia and worsens it. This article will try to go beyond Russian and Georgian positions to revise the historical fact of Georgia's incorporation into Russia, to analyse the incorporation's nature and significance and to rectify the popular errors and a "myth" about the incorporation in the two countries.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222