检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李长春[1] 胡世昌[1] 陈秀容[1] 练小丽[1]
出 处:《中国当代医药》2012年第12期22-23,共2页China Modern Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨家庭氧疗对慢性阻塞性肺疾病的影响。方法将120例慢性阻塞性肺部疾病患者分为治疗组与对照组各60例,两组首先均采用常规药物控制方法,治疗组在此基础上加用积极的家庭氧疗。结果经过治疗后,治疗组临床效果(100.0%)明显优于对照组(80.0%),两组数据在统计学上差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组和对照组患者治疗前VT、FEV1、FVC比较差异无统计学意义。治疗组患者治疗8周后FEV1与治疗前比较明显增加(P<0.05)。其他指标两组对比以及与治疗前对比差异均无统计学意义。结论家庭氧疗能够提高慢性阻塞性肺疾病的治疗效果,改善肺功能,值得推广应用。Objective To investigate the impact of home oxygen therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Methods One hundred and twenty patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients were divided into treatment group and control group,each group of 60 cases,the two groups were used conventional methods of drug control,the treatment group was based on the use of home oxygen therapy positive.Results After treatment,the clinical effect of the treatment group(100.0%) was higher than the control group(80.0%).Two sets of data in the statistical differences with a statistical significance(P 0.05).The VT,FEV1 and FVC compared were no statistically significant difference between treatment group and control group patients before treatment.Treatment group after 8 weeks of treatment compared with before treatment FEV1 was significantly increased(P 0.05).Other indicators comparing the two groups were compared with those before treatment were no statistically significant difference contrast.Conclusion The home oxygen therapy can improve the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease results in improving lung function,should be widely applied.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.80