检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵频[1] 祁秀娟[1] 汤秀明[1] 刘海宁[1] 刘建新[1] 刘玉杰[1] 景秀菊[1]
机构地区:[1]青岛大学医学院附属医院生殖中心,山东青岛266003
出 处:《齐鲁医学杂志》2012年第2期133-135,138,共4页Medical Journal of Qilu
摘 要:目的比较基因重组卵泡刺激素(r-FSH)及尿促卵泡刺激素(u-FSH)对体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)结局的影响。方法回顾性分析IVF-ET黄体中期长方案降调超促排卵173个周期的临床资料,其中应用r-FSH 69个周期,u-FSH 104个周期。比较两组促性腺激素(Gn)用量、药物费用、应用天数,注射人绒毛膜促性腺激素(HCG)日雌二醇(E2)、黄体生成素(LH)、孕激素(P)水平,以及≥14mm卵泡数、获卵数、优胚数、着床率、妊娠率及流产率等。结果 r-FSH组Gn用量显著少于u-FSH组(t=-4.017,P<0.001),r-FSH组Gn费用明显高于u-FSH组(t=9.282,P<0.001),但Gn应用天数两组间差异无显著性(t=0.920,P>0.05)。两组注射HCG日E2、LH及P水平差异无显著性(t=-0.539~0.938,P>0.05);两组注射HCG日≥14mm卵泡数、获卵数、优胚数比较差异无显著性(t=-0.255~1.778,P>0.05),着床率、妊娠率及流产率比较差异亦均无显著意义(χ2=0.138~3.142,P>0.05)。结论 r-FSH与u-FSH用于IVF-ET临床治疗结局无差异,u-FSH存在明显的价格优势。Objective To compare the outcome between recombinant follicle stimulating hormone(r-FSH) and urinary follicle stimulating hormone(u-FSH) for in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer(IVF-ET) cycles. Methods A retrospective analysis was done for medical records of 173 patients who had undergone IVF-ET treatment following down regulation with a long midluteal phase protocol were divided into r-FSH group(69 cases) and u-FSH group(104 cases).The outcomes of the two groups were compared. Results The dosages of Gn used in r-FSH group were significantly lower than that in u-FSH group(t=-4.017,P〈0.001),but the cost was higher(t=9.282,P〈0.001).The difference of the days of Gn stimulation between the two groups was not significant(t=-0.920,P〈0.05).Serum estradiol(E_2),luteinizing hormone(LH) and progesterone(P) levels on HCG day were not significantly different(t=-0.539-0.938,P〈0.05).There was no significant difference in the number of follicle ≥ 14 mm on HCG day,oocytes retrieved,as well as fine quality embryo,(t=-0.255-1.778,P〈0.05).There was also no significant difference between the two groups in terms of nidation,pregnancy rate and abortion rate(χ2=0.138-3.142,P〈0.05). Conclusion The treatment outcome of using r-FSH or u-FSH for IVF-ET is similar,but the cost of u-FSH is dramatically lower.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30