检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:许圣淳 陈樱花[2] 刘正钊[2] 章海涛[2] 鲍浩[2] 刘志红[2] 胡伟新[2]
机构地区:[1]南京大学临床医学院 [2]南京军区南京总医院全军肾脏病研究所,南京210016
出 处:《肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志》2012年第2期101-108,174,共9页Chinese Journal of Nephrology,Dialysis & Transplantation
基 金:中国人民解放军南京军区重点课题(072025)
摘 要:目的:既往研究证实多靶点疗法(MT)治疗Ⅳ+Ⅴ型狼疮性肾炎(LN)较传统静脉环磷酰胺冲击疗法(IVCY)能获得更高的诱导缓解率,本研究进一步探讨MT治疗Ⅳ+Ⅴ型LN的长期疗效和安全性。方法:将80例经肾活检证实的Ⅳ+Ⅴ型LN患者随机分为MT组(MT诱导缓解后MT维持,40例),和IVCY-硫唑嘌呤(AZA)组(IVCY诱导缓解后AZA维持,40例)。两组均同时予口服激素,总随访时间24月。主要疗效指标为完全缓解率,次要指标包括部分缓解、复发和不良反应发生率。结果:MT组和IVCY-AZA组分别有36例(90%)和24例(60%)获得诱导缓解(P<0.01),MT组6月(45%vs12.5%,P<0.01)和24月完全缓解率(80%vs47.5%,P<0.01)显著高于IVCY-AZA组。MT组和IVCY-AZA组分别有36例、21例进入维持期观察,两组24月内肾脏复发率(8.3%vs4.8%,P>0.05)及肾脏无复发生存率无明显差异。诱导期MT组和IVCY-AZA组感染发生率均为22.5%,IVCY-AZA组脱发、胃肠道症状发生率高于MT组(17.5%vs2.5%,22.5%vs5%,P<0.05),新发高血压仅出现在MT组。维持期MT组和IVCY-AZA组分别有11.1%和28.6%患者出现白细胞减低(P>0.05)。结论:采用多靶点疗法诱导,并维持治疗Ⅳ+Ⅴ型LN能获得较高缓解率、安全性好。Objective:To further evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of multi-target therapy (MT) as continuous induction and maintenance therapy for Class Ⅳ+Ⅴ LN. Methodology:Eighty patients with biopsy-proved Class Ⅳ+Ⅴ LN were included in this study. They were randomly assigned to MT group ( n = 40, MT inducing remission followed by MT maintenance) and IVCY-AZA group (n = 40, IVCY inducing remission followed by AZA maintenance), both in combination with prednisolone. The total duration of observation was 24 months. The primary end point was complete remission, and the secondary end point included partial remission, renal relapse, and adverse effects. Results: Thirty-six patients in MT group and 24 patients in IVCY-AZA group responded favorably (complete or partial remission) to induction treatment (P 〈 0. 01 ). In MT group, the complete-remission rate at 6 mo (45 % vs 12. 5% , P 〈 0.01 ) and 24 mo (80% vs 47. 5% ,P 〈0. 01 ) were significantly higher than those in IVCY-AZA group. The rate of renal relapse and renal relapse-free survival were similar between the two groups (8. 3% vs 4. 8% ,P 〉0. 05). Infections were noted in more than 20% of patients in both groups ( P 〉 0. 05 ). Alopecia, nausea and vomiting were more common during IVCY induction ( P 〈 0. 05 ), conversely, new onset hypertension occurred only in patients with MT induction ( P 〈 0. 05). During maintenance, both groups had favorable safety profile, with 11.1% and 28.6% patients of leucopenia episode (P 〉 0.05). Conclusion:MT therapy was an effective induction and maintenance treatment for patients with Class Ⅳ+Ⅴ LN, with higher response rate and favorable tolerability.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222