碳税对区域能源消费、经济增长和收入分配影响实证研究  

EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON EFFECTS OF CARBON TAXATION ON REGIONAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION,ECONOMIC GROWTH AND INCOME DISTRIBUTION

作　　者：王文举[1] 范允奇 

机构地区：[1]首都经济贸易大学经济学院,北京100070 [2]江南大学商学院,江苏无锡214122

出　　处：《长江流域资源与环境》2012年第4期442-447,共6页Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目(10AJY002);北京市高等学校人才强教深化计划高层次人才资助项目(PHR 20100513);北京市优秀博士学位论文指导教师人文社科项目(YB 20091003801);北京市社科联项目(2010SK011);首都经济贸易大学"研究生科技创新资助项目"(CUEB 2010539)

摘　　要：碳税对区域能源消费、经济增长和收入分配影响的研究尚属空白,分别采用面板数据模型的方法和面板分位数回归模型结合对应分析的方法,对这些效应进行实证研究,发现后者能够明显的揭示出我国碳税政策效应的差异性。研究表明:除大西北地区外,碳税对区域能源消费和经济增长都具有显著的抑制效应,且效应由西至东逐渐增强;碳税在各区域都导致资本要素在总收入中的分配比例增加,劳动要素的分配份额降低,但该效应在大西北地区较弱。因此,制定我国碳税政策除了借鉴以碳税效应产业差异为导向的"欧洲经验"以外,还应该注意区域差异,对中西部地区相对倾斜的区域差异性碳税政策可以在控制碳排放的同时促进区域间经济协调发展。Research of the effects of carbon taxation on regional energy consumption, economic growth and income distribution is still a blank. This article analyzed these effects by panel data model and quantile regression model. The study showed that quantile model was better in revealing the regional differences. Carbon taxation showed negative effects on the energy consumption and economic growth except in the Northwest Region, and the negative effects became strong gradually from west of east. Carbon taxation in each area increased the proportion of capital in the total income, decreased the proportion of the labor ele- ments, but this effect was weak in the Great Northwest. Therefore, in the process of making carbon taxa- tion, we should not only refer to ＂Europe Experiences＂, but also consider the regional differences. Different carbon taxation in different region which tilts to Middle and West area can both control carbon emission and promot coordinated development of regional economy .

关 键 词：碳税 区域差异 能源消费 经济增长 收入分配 

分 类 号：F063.2[经济管理—政治经济学]