我国海洋油污损害索赔现状及国家索赔路径探析  

On the Status Quo of China's Marine Oil Pollution Damage and Paths to State Claims

作　　者：邓海峰[1] 刘星星[1] 

机构地区：[1]清华大学法学院,北京100084

出　　处：《山东科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2012年第1期60-66,共7页Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)

基　　金：中国海洋发展研究中心2010年度青年项目"海洋环境容量资源用益制度研究"(AOCQN201029);清华大学2009年度自主科研计划"我国海洋权益保护相关法律问题研究"(Z207);中国法学会2011年部级法学理论课题"海洋油污损害典型案例分析与国家求偿机制研究"(CLS2011-80)

摘　　要：在我国,国家有权就海洋油污损害提出索赔,索赔路径可选择诉讼、仲裁、和解三种方式。根据现行立法,代表国家提出索赔的行政机关应按照具体的损失类型而定;但从未来立法展望来讲,我国可以在理顺国有自然资源管理体制的基础之上,建立国家自然资源监督管理委员会来专门负责国有自然资源的保值、增值。具体由何级行政机关代表国家行使索赔权,可以根据油污损害范围和造成的直接经济损失来确定。In China, the State has the right to claim for compensation for marine oil pollution damage, and the paths to claims include litigation, arbitration and reconciliation. Under the current legislation, administrative organ which can represent the State to claim should be determined by the type of damage. But from the perspective of future legislation, China can straighten out the management system of state-owned natural resources, and then set up ＂China Natural Resources Supervision and Administration Commission＂ to manage the maintenance and value increment of state-owned natural resources. The specific level of administrative organ eligible for the claim can be determined by the scope of oil pollution and the direct economic loss.

关 键 词：海洋油污损害 国家索赔 行政机关 索赔路径 

分 类 号：D922.6[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]