检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《财会通讯(下)》2012年第4期22-26,共5页Communication of Finance and Accounting
摘 要:本文借助收益模型和价格模型,通过对126家上市公司11年的连续观测,考察会计信息的价值相关性及其在1997-2007年间的变化趋势。比较了收益模型和价格模型在中国市场的适用性及其改良,关注了在金融危机、股权分置改革、新会计准则颁发实施等重大经济事件前后价值相关性的强度变化。研究发现,价格模型比收益模型在现阶段更具有普适性,每股收益、每股净资产等会计信息具有较强价值相关性,会计信息的价值相关性自"信任危机"后得到显著增强,并且与公司盈利状况有关。This time-series research using return model and price model tried to find the features and trends of the accounting information and its relative value. All the accounting information covering 11 continuative years came from 126 companies from Shanghai Stock Market. This research made a comprehensive comparison with these two models, discussed their applicability and possible improvement, and investigated the strength of the information value during several important economic events, such as Financial Crisis, Enron Event and the birth of New Accounting Standards. We found price model is more valid and explainable when it comes to Chinese market. Several accounting indexes (EPS, BVPS, EPS/Pt-1 and ROE) own significant relativity with market return and stock price. This relativity gets stronger after Enron Event and is more evident to the companies that get positive profit.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200