检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湖南大学金融与统计学院,湖南长沙410079
出 处:《统计与信息论坛》2012年第4期3-9,共7页Journal of Statistics and Information
摘 要:商业银行X效率测评是目前银行业研究的热点之一。常用的DEA与SFA方法在模型设定上存在缺陷,StoNED方法与超效率DEA方法吸收了DEA与SFA方法的优点。从理论与实证两个方面对StoNED方法与超效率DEA方法进行比较研究,理论比较包括数学原理、方法背景、准确性、科学性等方面。以劳动力、固定资产原值、存款为投入指标,以税前利润为产出指标,利用两种方法对2007-2009年中国商业银行X效率进行了测度,实证表明StoNED方法测度商业银行X效率具有一定的优势。At present,the measurement and assessment of X-efficiency for commercial banks is becoming a hot focus for the study in bank management.Considering the weakness of DEA and SFA methods in terms of model setting,this article explores two methods: StoNED and super-efficiency DEA theoratically and practically through comparing and integrating their merits,in which the theoratical comparison mainly includes the study of pure mathematics,methods and backgrounds,accuracy and scientificity,etc.The X-effciency of Chinese commercial banks from 2007 to 2009 is measued by the above two methods with productivity,fixed initial asset value and deposit being the investment index,and pretax profit being output index.According to results of measuring it has been proved that certain advantages do be held by StoNED method.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.165.235