检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《河北医学》2012年第4期484-486,共3页Hebei Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨妇产科腹部手术切口脂肪液化的有效治疗方法。方法:回顾性分析在我院2003年1月至2010年12月间进行妇产科腹部手术出现手术切口脂肪液化的73例患者,其中35例患者采取的是常规治疗方法作为对照组,38例患者采取微波治疗法作为实验组,观察两组的临床治疗效果。结果:实验组患者切口愈合时间为7.32±8.24d,总有效率为92.11%;对照组分别为10.84±13.34d,总有效率为74.29%,两组数据P<0.05均具有显著差异。结论:相对于常规治疗方法,微波疗法可以降低切口脂肪液化的愈合时间,提高治疗的有效率。Objective: To study effective treatment of fat liquefaction in gynecologic abdominal incision.Method: In our hospital from Jan.2003 to Dec.2010,73 fat liquefaction in gynecologic abdominal incision were divided into two groups,one is therapy group of treatment with microwave 38 cases and the other is conventional treatment group 35 cases.After treatment,We observed the clinical results.Result:Experimental group wound healing time was 8.24 ± 7.32 days,total effective rate was 92.11%;those in the control group were 10.84 ± 13.34d,total effective rate was 74.29%,There were significantly different between the datas(P0.05).Conclusion: Treatment with microwave in the treatment of fat liquefaction in gynecologic abdominal incision superior to conventional treatment,It can reduce the healing time,cut fat liquefaction and improve the efficiency of treatment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222