检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]重庆市急救医疗中心妇产科,400014 [2]重庆三峡中心医院妇产科,404000
出 处:《重庆医学》2012年第12期1189-1190,共2页Chongqing medicine
摘 要:目的探讨子宫动脉栓塞术治疗剖宫产后子宫瘢痕部位妊娠的临床疗效。方法将73例剖宫产后子宫瘢痕部位妊娠分为子宫栓塞组和药物治疗组,观察两组患者的临床疗效。结果刮宫术前准备时间、刮宫术出血量、住院时间和术后人血绒毛膜促性腺激素(β-HCG)水平子宫栓塞组明显低于药物治疗组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),住院费用发现两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论子宫动脉栓塞术治疗子宫剖宫产瘢痕处妊娠具有快速、安全的优点,值得临床推广应用。Objective To investigate the clinical value of uterine arterial embolization for treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.Methods 73 cases with cesarean scar pregnancy were divided into embolism group and treatment group.The clinical curative effect of two groups was observed.Results The preparation time before curettage,curettage bleeding,hospital stay,and postoperative beta-HCG levels in embolism group were significantly lower than those of treatment group(P〈0.01).There was no significant difference in cost of hospitalization between the two groups(P〈0.05).Conclusion Uterine arterial embolization is a fast and safe method for treatment of uterine cesarean scar pregnancy.It is worthy of clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30