检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]安徽中医学院第一附属医院麻醉科,合肥市230031
出 处:《实用疼痛学杂志》2012年第1期32-34,共3页Pain Clinic Journal
摘 要:目的比较地佐辛与芬太尼预先镇痛复合丙泊酚静脉麻醉在人工流产术中的效果及不良反应。方法拟行人工流产术的孕妇90例,随机分为3组,每组30例。D组预先静脉注射地佐辛0.1mg/kg,F组预先静脉注射芬太尼1μg/kg,P组为对照组。各组均静脉注射丙泊酚2mg/kg。观察各组呼吸循环变化,记录丙泊酚总用量、麻醉诱导时间、唤醒时间、宫缩痛及不良反应。结果D组和F组术中血压、心率、丙泊酚总用量、丙泊酚注射痛和体动发生率较P组降低,F组术中呼吸抑制发生率高于其余2组(P〈0.05)。结论地佐辛预先镇痛复合丙泊酚麻醉用于人工流产术的效果优于芬太尼复合丙泊酚麻醉或单纯丙泊酚麻醉,且无芬太尼的呼吸抑制作用。Objective To observe and compare the effects and adverse reactions of dezocine with fentanyl in preemptive analgesia combined with propofol intravenous anesthesia on artificial abortion. Methods Ninety pregnant women scheduled for abortion were randomly divided into three groups, 30 cases in eactx. Dezocine 0.1 mg/kg was given intravenously in group D, fentanyl 1 μg/kg in group F, nothing in group P. Propofol 2 mg/kg was given intravenously in all the groups. The changes in respiratory and circulatory systems were observed. The total amount of propofol, induction time, wake-up time, uterine contraction, pain and adverse reactions were recorded. Results Compared with group P, HR, MAP, propofol consumption, the incidences of injection pain and body movement during the operation were decreased in group D. The rate of respiratory inhibition was higher in group F than that in the others. Conclusion Dezocine preemptive analgesia combined with propofol intravenous anesthesia has a better effect than preemptive fentanyl combined with propofol anesthesia or propofol anesthesia alone during artificial abortion, and has no respiratory inhibition.
分 类 号:R169.42[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28