检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]黑龙江省医院妇产科,黑龙江哈尔滨150036
出 处:《中国现代医生》2012年第13期129-130,共2页China Modern Doctor
摘 要:目的比较分析腹腔镜切除子宫肌瘤与开腹剔除子宫肌瘤的手术效果。方法将35例应用腹腔镜切除子宫肌瘤的患者设立为A组,另选择同期35例开腹剔除子宫肌瘤患者设立为B组,比较两组的临床手术观察指标和并发症情况。结果与B组比较,A组手术时间短、术中出血量少,住院时间短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜切除子宫肌瘤具有并发症少、手术时间短、术中出血量少、术后住院时间短等优点,值得推广和应用。Objective To compare the effect of laparoscopic removal of uterine fibroids and laparotomy excluding surgery for uterine fibroids. Methods 35 cases of laparoscopic removal of uterine fibroids in patients with the establishment of group A, another selected the same period 35 cases of open surgery to remove uterine fibroids established as group B, the indicators and complications were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with group B, surgical time of group A was short, less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, the difference was statistically signifcant (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The laparoscopic removal of uterine fibroids has fewer complications, shorter operative time, less blood loss, shorter postoperative hospital stay, etc, should be the promotion and application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30