腹股沟疝无张力修补术与传统疝修补术的疗效比较  

The efficacy comparison of tension-free inguinal hernia repair surgery and traditional hernia repair

作　　者：王荣迅[1] 沙广春[1] 蓝鹏[1] 

机构地区：[1]江苏省邳州市中医院普外科,江苏邳州221300

出　　处：《中国现代医生》2012年第13期159-160,共2页China Modern Doctor

摘　　要：目的比较分析腹股沟疝无张力修补术与传统疝修补术的手术效果。方法2009年1月～2011年1月收治腹股沟疝患者100例．其中应用无张力疝修补术治疗50例作为观察组，同期应川传统疝修补术的50例作为对照组，结果观察组的手术时间短、术中出血少、术后患者下床时间早，住院时间也短于对照组，术后并发症发生率低，且复发率低，两组比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论腹股沟疝尢张力修补术较传统疝修补术具有手术时间短、术中出血少、术后并发症少、复发率低等优点，值得广泛推广和应川。Objective To compare the efficacy of tension-free inguinal hernia repair surgery and hernia repair surgery. Methods Seleced 100 eases inguinal hernia patients from January 2009 to January 2011 in our hospital.and tension-free hernia repair treatment of 50 cases as the observation group, 50 cases of the same period in the application of traditional hernia repair as a control group. Results The observation group had shorter operative time, less blood loss, postoperative ambulation earlier, length of stay was also shorter than the control group,the postoperative complication rate, low recurrence rate, the difference was significant between two groups（P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion The tension-free inguinal hernia repair has the advantage of shorter operative time, less bleeding, fewer complications, lower recurrence rate than traditional hernia repair, and it is worthy of extensive promotion and application.

关 键 词：腹股沟疝无张力修补术 传统疝修补术 

分 类 号：R656.21[医药卫生—外科学]