检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华南农业大学公共管理学院,广东广州510642
出 处:《广东工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2012年第3期34-39,共6页Journal of Guangdong University of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:广东省哲学社会科学规划"十二五"规划2011年度学科共建项目"网络视角下残疾人家庭照顾者的照顾经验;社会排斥与社会支持研究"(GD11XS02)
摘 要:随着我国残疾人口日益增多,机构照顾面临容量有限、成本开支居高不下等问题。居家照顾成为解决这些问题的出路之一。文章以两家残疾人服务机构为例,就机构照顾和居家照顾在服务对象、服务提供者、服务提供方式、服务特点及优缺点等方面进行比较分析,指出机构照顾与居家照顾模式各有优缺点,针对不同类型残疾人的不同需求,可以取其优势更好地提供服务。With the increase in the number of the Chinese disabled population,institutional care has been faced with problems like limited capacity,high expenditure and so on.In this context,home care is becoming a way to solve these problems.This article,taking two disabled service organizations for example,compares institutional care and home care from the following aspects: service objects,service providers,means of delivering service,service features,and their service advantages and disadvantages,and points out that the two models both have some advantages and disadvantages.Therefore,we should make better use of their respective advantages and render better service according to the different needs of different types of people.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.104