检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈冬梅[1] 卢月珍[1] 林艺珍[1] 卜秋冰[1]
出 处:《护士进修杂志》2012年第9期789-791,共3页Journal of Nurses Training
摘 要:目的探讨气管切开肺部感染患者应用集束化干预措施的效果。方法将2010年1~12月86例气管切开肺部感染患者作为干预组,选取2009年1~12月病情类似的85例气管切开患者作为对照组,比较两组肺部感染持续时间、置管时间、并发症发生情况及预后。结果对照组肺部感染的持续时间、气管切开及住ICU时间明显长于干预组,两组比较差异有显著意义(P<0.05),对照组气管切开期间并发症发生较干预组明显增多。结论采用集束化干预措施能有效预防和降低气管切开患者并发症的发生,缩短感染持续时间、置管时间及住ICU的时间。Objective To approach the effect of bundles of care on tracheostomy patients of lung infection. Meth- od 171 cases were randomly divided into an intervention group(n = 86 cases from 2010) and control group (n = 85 ca- ses from 2009). The lung infection time, the tracheotomy tube keeping time, the complications and the prognosis were observed in two groups. Result The time of lung infection, of tracheostomy and ICU stay time in control group were longer than the intervention group. The differences were statically significant(P^0.05). Comparing with the intervention group, the incidence of complications were higher in the control group. Conclusion Bundles of care could prevent and decrease the incidence of complications on tracheostomy. The lung infection time, the tracheotomy tube keeping time and the ICU stay time would be decurtated with the bundles of care.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.185