监护人责任若干争议问题探讨  

On Several Issues related to Liability for Guardian

作　　者：刘保玉[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京航空航天大学法学院,北京100191

出　　处：《法学论坛》2012年第3期38-47,共10页Legal Forum

基　　金：作者承担的国家哲学社会科学基金项目(08BFX070);山东省哲学社会科学规划项目(07JDB012)"民事实体法和程序法的制度衔接与规则协调"的阶段性成果之一

摘　　要：我国《侵权责任法》第32条第1款确立了监护人责任适用无过错责任原则,并设有责任减轻事由;该条第2款不涉及归责原则问题,仅关涉有财产的被监护人与其监护人之间如何支付赔偿费用的内部关系;该条的两款规定,形成了"外部、内部关系区分"的体系构造。在关涉被监护人致人损害的数人侵权中,数个致害人的监护人之间及其监护人与其他责任主体之间形成的责任形态难以统一规定,应区分不同的责任主体并结合侵权类型具体认定。由于我国立法上未承认限制行为能力人和无行为能力人的侵权责任能力,故在被监护人致人损害的情况下,其责任主体是监护人,而非被监护人;在监护人责任纠纷诉讼中,应单列监护人为被告。The first clause of Article 32 in the Tort Liability Law of P. R. China provides that the imputative principle of liability for guardian is no-fault liability which has a special extenuating circumstance; the second clause of this article merely focuses on the internal relationship the payment for compensation expenditure, which does not involve the imputative principle of liability. Consequently the systematic structure of these two clauses of the above article is to “the distinction between external and internal relationship”. It almost cannot make a unified regulation about the liability form among several guardians and ‘ the guardian and other subject of liability＇ in the multiple - parties torts and it should make specific decisions in terms of different subjects of lia-bility; the civil defendant in the case of the liability for guardian should be the guardian.

关 键 词：监护人责任 归责原则 体系构造 责任形态 诉讼主体 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]