检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张清[1] 岳涛 周凌[1] 刘玮[1] 包军[1] 徐沪济[1]
机构地区:[1]第二军医大学附属长征医院风湿免疫科,上海200003 [2]上海市光华中西医结合医院风湿科
出 处:《中华风湿病学杂志》2012年第5期335-338,共4页Chinese Journal of Rheumatology
基 金:基金项目:国家自然科学基金(81172782);上海市自然科学基金(10ZR1422500)
摘 要:目的观察人重组白细胞介素-1受体拮抗剂(IL-IRa)联合甲氨蝶呤治疗活动期类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的疗效。方法54例经甲氨蝶呤治疗至少12周以上的活动期RA患者,随机接受每日皮下注射IL-1Ra80mg或安慰剂,每4周进行随访,按照美国风湿病学会制订的疗效标准评估临床疗效,共24周。应用矿检验比较2治疗组间疗效达到ACR20、ACR50和ACR70的患者比例的差异。应用t检验(参数分析)或者秩和检验(非参数分析)比较2治疗组间基线值变量和28个关节的疾病活动指数(DAS28)的差异。结果在治疗第24周,IL-1Ra联合甲氨蝶呤治疗组中27例(64%)的患者疗效改善达到ACR20,显著高于安慰剂组2例(17%)(P=0.004)。IL-1Ra治疗组中,38%的患者疗效改善达到ACR50,17%达到ACR70;而安慰剂组中无一例达到ACR50或ACR70改善。然而,接受IL.1Ra治疗的42例患者中有9例在初始治疗时病情显著改善,但之后却出现疗效下降。结论IL,1Ra通过阻断IL-1,可有效改善活动期RA患者的临床表现。然而,大约1/5接受IL-1Ra治疗的患者发生继发性失效。Objective To assess the efficacy of interleukin (IL)-IRa, a recombinant human IL-1 receptor antagonist, plus methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) refractory to MTX therapy. Methods A total of 54 patients with active RA, who had been taking MTX at a stable dosage, were randomized to receive daily subcutaneous injections of IL-IRa (80 rag) or placebo. The proportion of patients who had a response as assessed by ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 was analyzed using Chi-square test measures.Baseline variables and DAS28 were analyzed using Student's t-test (parametric) or Wilcoxon's rank sum test (nonparametric) as appropriate. Results After 24 weeks, more patients achieved clinical benefits treated with IL-1Ra plus MTX compared with MTX alone (64% vs 17%, P=0.004) as determined by the ACR20 improvement. In the IL-1Ra group, an ACR50 response was observed in 38% and an ACRT0 response in 17%. None of the patients treated with MTX alone achieved ACR50 or ACR 70 improvement. However, 9 of 42 (21%) patients in the IL-1Ra group, who showed therapeutic response initially, had secondary drug failure to IL-1Ra therapy thereafter. A significant increase in mean responders to IL-1Ra, compared with placebo. Conclusion DAS28 from baseline was found in the non- IL-1Ra is effective for the treatment of patients with active RA by blocking IL-1. However, the efficacy of IL-1Ra is lost soon in about one-fifth of patients in spite of initial good response.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30