检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:洛岩[1]
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院,北京102488
出 处:《法学杂志》2012年第5期163-167,共5页Law Science Magazine
摘 要:通过对联合国框架下的人权条约、各区域人权条约以及主要缔约国在外国人财产权保障方面的规定和做法进行研究,可知联合国人权条约对一般意义上个人(包括外国人)财产权的保护程度明显偏弱,各区域人权公约对财产权的保护则各有侧重,各缔约国对外国人的财产普遍有一定限制。其中有不少是我国在外国人财产权方面制定和适用法律、规则可借鉴的做法。This article draws the conclusions that the international human rights treaties under UN structure do not totally prohibit treating persons differently according to differentiated nationalities, and the protection of individual (including the aliens') property fights in general terms by the international human rights treaties under UN structure is very weak, while the regional human rights treaties pay attentions on different aspects of the protection of the property rights, and nearly every country has some kind of limitation on the property fights of aliens, as well as bring forward the modus operandi drawn from such conclusions which we can learn from for the establishment of laws and regulations for the property fights of aliens by China. Through systematic analysis of provisions of international human fights law under UN structure, regional human fights treaties concern the property fights, as well as modus operandi of the protection of the property rights by main contracting states.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229