改良拔河针法治疗髌骨软化症临床观察  

Clinical Observation on Chondromalacia Patellae Treated with Modified Tug of War Needling Method

作　　者：燕军[1] 蒋素英[1] 孟江[1] 黄金良[1] 郑波[1] 梁宁燕[1] 

机构地区：[1]广州医学院附属深圳沙井医院,广东深圳518104

出　　处：《中华中医药学刊》2012年第5期1111-1112,共2页Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine

基　　金：深圳市宝安区科技局资助项目(20110494)

摘　　要：目的:观察改良拔河针法治疗髌骨软化症的临床疗效。方法:将60例患者随机分为两组,A组治疗组(30例)及B组对照组(30例)。治疗组采用改良拔河针法治疗;对照组采用双氯芬酸双释胶囊75mg内服。结果:治疗组总有效率为93.33%,对照组总有效率为73.33%,经统计学处理,χ2=4.32,P<0.05,差异有统计学意义,说明治疗组总有效率高于对照组。两组临床治愈率分别为50%、23.33%,经统计学处理,χ2=4.59,P<0.05,差异有统计学意义,说明治疗组临床治愈率高于对照组。结论:改良拔河针法治疗髌骨软化症疗效优于双氯芬酸双释胶囊内服。Objective：To observe the clinical effect of tug of war needling method on chondromalacia patellae patients.Method：60 patients were divided into two groups：treatment group（group A：30 cases）and control group（group B：30 cases）.The patients of group A accepted modified tug of war needling method,while the patients in group B treated with oral administration of diclofena capsule（75mg）.Results：The total effective rate of group A was 93.33%,while group B was 73.33%.We found the difference was significant（χ2=4.32,P0.05）from the statistical treatment.It indicated that the total effective rate of group A was higher than that of group B.The cure rates of the two groups were 50%,23.33% respectively.The difference was significant（χ2=4.59,P0.05）.It indicated that the cure rate of group A was higher than that of group B.Conclusion：The clinical effect of tug of war needling method is better than oral administration of diclofena on treating chondromalacia patellae.

关 键 词：改良拔河针法 髌骨软化症 

分 类 号：R681.8[医药卫生—骨科学]