单个液滴蒸发模型中不同质量传递公式的有效性分析  

Validation analysis of different mass transfer formula in single droplet evaporation model

作　　者：辛娟娟[1] 周致富[1] 辛慧[1] 陈斌[1] 王国祥[1,2] 郭烈锦[1] 

机构地区：[1]西安交通大学动力工程能动学院多相流国家重点实验室,陕西西安710049 [2]美国Akron大学机械工程系

出　　处：《化工学报》2012年第6期1704-1708,共5页CIESC Journal

基　　金：长江学者讲座教授配套项目;中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金(2011jdhz35;xjj20100214)~~

摘　　要：液滴蒸发是液体喷雾的重要物理过程,文献中使用了不同的模型计算液滴蒸发中的质量流率。依据质量传递驱动力的处理,可将这些模型归类于3种不同形式,即:经典模型、质量类比模型和漂移流动模型。对这些模型的来源和假设作了分析和总结,发现经典模型忽略了瞬态效应,质量类比模型忽略了Stefan流效应,而飘移流动模型同时考虑了Stefan流效应和质量迁移,应为正确的表述。最后以两种不同蒸发率条件下的液滴蒸发为例进行计算,研究了不同质量传递驱动力对液滴蒸发的影响,发现经典模型和质量类比模型都对液滴的蒸发估计过低,且高蒸发率下3种模型对液滴蒸发特性的影响更显著。Droplet evaporation is one of the important physical processes in liquid spray.Various models have been formulated in literature to compute the mass flow rate of droplet evaporation.It is found that all these models can be written in a single formulation,with various models represented by different expressions in the driving force HM,which can be classified into three kinds,namely,classical model,mass analogy model and drift-flux model.In this paper,we perform an analysis of the assumptions involved in the derivation of the three kinds of models,and find that the drift-flux model,which takes into account the effects of Stefan flow and corrective mass transfer,is the correct expression,while the classical model ignores Stefan flow effect and the mass analogy model ignores transient effect.Then the influence of mass driving force HM on droplet evaporation is analyzed,and it is concluded that both the classical model and the mass analogy model underestimate the effect of evaporation especially at high evaporate rates.

关 键 词：液体喷雾 液滴蒸发 质量传递驱动力 质量流率 

分 类 号：TK121[动力工程及工程热物理—工程热物理]