检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:薛娟[1] 严谨[2] 朱海燕[3] 阳建福[1] 孙晓辉[1] 李艳辉[1] 尹光明[1]
机构地区:[1]中南大学湘雅三医院泌尿外科,湖南长沙410013 [2]中南大学湘雅三医院护理部,湖南长沙410013 [3]中南大学湘雅三医院麻醉科,湖南长沙410013
出 处:《中国医疗器械杂志》2012年第3期229-230,共2页Chinese Journal of Medical Instrumentation
摘 要:目的比较和评价两种医用引流袋使用效果。方法将206例患者随机分成二组,每组各103例,对使用不同的引流袋时,引流袋更换所需时间、脱管发生率、袋体更换时引流液外溅率、医患使用满意度4个指标进行统计学分析。结果两组脱管发生率、更换引流袋所需时间、袋体更换时引流液外溅率、医务人员及患者使用满意度比较有差异,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论新型医用引流袋使用方便快捷、省时省力,提高了工作效率,有效地防止职业伤害,保护了医护人员。Objective To compare and evaluate the effectiveness of two kinds of medical drainage bag. Methods 206 patients were randomly divided into two groups each of which consisted of 103 patients. - All the data including four indices, such as the time required to replace the drainage bags, the incidence of the bags detached, draining fluid splashing rates during the replacement of the bags, patient and medical staff satisfaction, were collected and analyzed statistically. Results The time required to replace the drainage bags, the incidence of the bags detached and draining fluid splashing rates during the replacement of the bags of the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the control group (P〈0.05), while the patient and medical staff satisfaction were significantly higher than those of the control group (P〈0.05). Conclusion It is convenient, quick and time and effort saving to use the neotype medical drainage bags. Hence, the use of neotype medical drainage bags could help to improve the work efficiency, effectively prevent occupational injuries and protect health care workers.
分 类 号:TH789[机械工程—仪器科学与技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249