检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南财经大学国际商学院
出 处:《亚太经济》2012年第3期137-143,共7页Asia-Pacific Economic Review
基 金:西南财经大学"211工程"重点建设项目资助
摘 要:本文应用博弈论等研究方法,依据两岸同为WTO成员以及ECFA是WTO框架下的区域合作形式等客观事实,论证两岸经贸合作的法理依据及正常经贸关系,分析两岸建立正常经贸关系的现实基础及现存差距,界定两岸经贸关系正常化的涵义,探寻消除差距、实现两岸经贸关系正常化的基本路径。Scholars all agreed that economic and trade normalization is the basic of cross-strait economic cooperation mechanism, ECFA has provided important factors for normalization and institutionalization of crossstraits economic relations. But to what is the normal trade relations, what is the connotation of normalization and how to realize via ECFA, few literatures involved. In view of this, based on the author and other scholars' researches, concerning that both sides are WTO members and ECFA is under the framework of WTO. This paper using game theory demonstrates the legal basis and reasonable state of cross-strait trade and economic cooperation, then analyzes the existing basis and the gap between the ideal and reality, specifically defines the meaning of normalization, and explores the path via ECFA to remove the gap and achieve the normalization of cross-strait economic and trade relations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38