检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋玉磊[1] 林征[2] 林琳[3] 王美峰[3] 张红杰[3]
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学护理学院,南京市210029 [2]南京医科大学第一附属医院护理部 [3]南京医科大学第一附属医院消化科
出 处:《中华护理杂志》2012年第6期485-487,共3页Chinese Journal of Nursing
基 金:南京医科大学第一附属医院新技术新项目基金资助项目(编号:2011002)
摘 要:目的探讨生物反馈治疗联合综合护理干预对功能性便秘患者的远期疗效,为临床护理干预的实施提供依据。方法采用问卷调查方式,对120例接受生物反馈治疗的功能性便秘患者进行回顾性分析,对患者生物反馈治疗前、后和随访时临床症状积分进行调查和比较,评价生物反馈治疗的远期疗效,同时采用简明健康调查问卷(SF-36)对患者生活质量进行调查。结果生物反馈治疗后1~6年的有效率为70.7%,远期疗效满意,但较治疗后即时疗效(93.6%)稍低(P<0.01)。生物反馈治疗后1~6年随访时,SF-36得分除生理功能维度外,其他各维度得分均显著高于生物反馈治疗前(P<0.01),略低于生物反馈治疗后即时(P>0.05)。结论生物反馈治疗功能性便秘的远期疗效满意,但较即时疗效稍低。临床应用时不仅要重视治疗期间的护理干预,还应加强随访管理,鼓励坚持家庭训练,以提高远期疗效。Objective To evaluate the long-term efficacy of biofeedback treatment for patients with functional constipation (FC). Methods Totally 120 FC patients treated by biofeedback therapy were followed up. The symptoms of constipation and quality of life were measured at baseline and after the completion of biofeedback therapy. Results The clinical efficacy was 70.7 percent at 1 to 6 years after biofeedback therapy. The long-term efficacy was satisfactory,but was lower than the short-term efficacy(93.6 percent,P〈0.01). After biofeedback therapy,the factor scores of SF-36 were significantly higher than before(P〈0.0l) except physiological functioning. Conclusion The long-term clinical efficacy of biofeedback therapy is satisfactory,although it is lower than short-term efficacy. It is suggested to strengthen the management of follow up to improve the long-term efficacy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28